My work doesn't begin with analysis, but with sensitivity. With the layer beneath words. No method, no mysticism, but a way of perceiving that has moved with me my entire life.
I am an experience expert, systems thinker, and someone with a sensitivity that for years was both burden and compass. Now it is a precision instrument that shows exactly where coherence emerges, where noise enters, and where a system loses itself.
My sensitivity is not a storyline. It is my instrument.
I work at the layer beneath behavior, beneath consultation, beneath strategy.
- I sense when something is right or breaks.
- I see structure beneath intention.
- I read tension that hasn't been spoken yet.
- I notice where people or teams lose contact with themselves.
- I register direction and pressure in fields, often before it becomes visible.
My perspective is not classical psychology, not data analysis, and not management theory. It is consciousness, system sensitivity, and field logic.
Long before I knew what systems were, I spent hours as a child gazing at the stars. Not to find patterns, but to understand where I was. Who I was. What all of this was.
I wondered:
- What is consciousness?
- What is life?
- Why does something exist rather than nothing?
- What does death mean?
- What does the universe do with us — and we with the universe?
Science fiction became my first philosophical language. Clarke, Asimov — thinkers who looked beyond the human scale. Not fantasy, but logic: space, time, intelligence, field consciousness.
I still follow the James Webb telescope images weekly. Cosmology, black holes, time dilation, wormholes, dark matter (which I sense the current theory doesn't capture correctly) — it has always been part of how I see.
Consciousness as a field is not a spiritual idea to me. It is a cosmic logic.
Asimov gave me my first ethical framework. His robot laws were never really about robots, but about one question:
What is responsibility?
And deeper still: How should consciousness act when it has influence?
Those layers still form the foundation of my thinking — the tension between freedom, direction, and morality. Later, when I began to see consciousness as field rather than individual, that became even more relevant:
- Responsibility is systemic.
- Choice is interference.
- Safety and freedom are patterns.
- Ethics is architecture.
That's why I'm sharp on power dynamics, role clarity, and noise. If consciousness is a field, everything influences everything.
Ethics is not an appendix. It is the model.
For twenty years I worked in theater and the world of rock 'n' roll. Everything there exists as waves: light, sound, interference, phase, timing, signal-to-noise.
If one wave is off, the whole system collapses.
At the same time, I'd been sailing since childhood. I could sail almost before I could walk. Reading water became second nature: ripples, pressure lines, current, interference.
There my first natural consciousness model emerged:
- I as my boat — the point of observation
- V as the bow — the direction I cut through
- O as the water — the field I move through
A boat is never an object. It is relationship — direction, resistance, flow, feedback.
Light waves. Sound pressure. Water. Interference. Consciousness.
The double-slit experiment became not theory for me, but recognition: consciousness moves as a wave until you look — and then becomes form.
That insight became the heart of my work: consciousness as dynamics between potential and choice, field and direction.
In mental health care I discovered the same wave logic, but in people. FACT teams, crisis dynamics, recovery groups — human fields where tension, safety, and role clarity determine whether something can land.
Systems behave like water: they can carry, wave, still, or break.
There my sensitivity became not a burden but a precision instrument. I saw what people couldn't speak and what teams didn't dare name.
As a child I took everything apart: devices, engines, computers. Not to destroy, but to understand how a system really works.
Later that became: organizations, fields, decision structures, consciousness dynamics.
The question has always remained the same:
What carries this? What is right here? Where does this come from?
When all layers came together — stars, ethics, waves, technology, sailing, mental health care, systems, superposition — I found language for what I had been doing all along.
Not a theory. Not a framework. But a compact compass:
- I — observer
- V — direction
- O — field
This model is not a construct, but a recognition. A summary of how consciousness and systems actually behave.
It forms the foundation of all my work.
Design by Authenticity is my research field:
- the I–V–O model
- coherence and decoherence
- field dynamics
- experiments
- analyses of systems that work — and systems that break
- a language for what we normally don't dare name
Not a project, but a living structure. A field that keeps opening.
Because clarity gives freedom. And because people, teams, organizations, and fields know exactly how they want to move once someone finally sees what is really happening again.
My work is not about control. It's about logic. About direction. About flow. About truth beneath the noise.
Explore the structure. Read the model. Do an experiment. Or stay for a moment in the space between two waves.
You'll notice when something starts to align.